First wave of the impact that WikiLeaks documents created, seems to be overcome with a little damage. According to the countries which documents belong to, the places they have been leaked from, the way of releasing them and the impact of those documents, countries which are affected seem to escape lightly. Of course, for now. State Department also poses that it admitted there are thousands of leaked documents. It is seen that, in order to prevent the higher damage that scandal may lead to, Washington uses "known" ways. Those are:
1- Denying access to the website
2- Cutting off the financial resources
3- Silencing the founder, Assange
4- Buying editors/ implicit threat

‘CHICKEN FEED'

Against those ways, the chance of success is low. Yet, the case is not only the American Documents, but also the global dimension. Lots of countries, hundreds of politicians, thousands of volunteers, millions of followers are somehow mentioned in the leaked documents. American authority and American secret services try to turn the inevitable actions to their favor. Washington prepares for to use the information in the leaked documents that will be released in the best possible way as serving in to its own interest. On one hand, politicians play the role of the aggrieved, on the other hand, the way of presenting the documents will be changed via controlling the media. Diluted and directed information will be soften with chicken feed. Moreover, a powerful lobby desiring the ad-hoc limitation of the freedom in the name of "national security", increased its voice in the corridors of Langlay. Just like in Irangate scandal. An unending vicious circle.
In fact, the leakage of thousands of American secret documents resulted in questioning the ways of protecting the secret documents for not only the American secret services but also all of the countries in the world. Because, the case is not a simple "Blow Compromise". There is a violation of red line between open society and national security. CIA and NSA see the case more seriously than the copying of the leaked documents in the event of war in Afghanistan and Iraq. Because the leakage did not happen from a place as complex as the headquarters of the war in Baghdad, it happened from central offices such as Washington and Ankara. Secret services should focus on the different power groups as the source of the leakage. For example, documents related to leakage in Ankara concentrates on the period of Ambassador Eric Edelman who is known close to Neocons. Turkish-American relations can not be said to be very good in the period of Edelman. In addition , it should be noted that the scandal triggered just after Republicans won the election. Republicians are more likely to win the presidential elections in the next period and the internal arrangements are made for a more aggressive security policy than Bush era. The internal strife dimension of the leakage must be understood in this way. It seems that the initiative shifted from Pentagon to State Department. It is obvious that the presence of the current situation is creating disorder. State Department is attacked by the leakage. Thus, in the leakage which is started by Pentagon's war plans, initiative is gained by falcons. In words of Italian Minister of Foreign Affairs, "September 11 of Diplomacy" will bring radical changes in the ways of working of diplomats and in the form of intelligence.
‘WALK-IN'

Wikileaks remains like 'Walk-in' position in this power struggle. Thousands of American secret documents passed into the hands of a team of activists who are seen as opposition. Moreover, the documents began to be published; the American side also approved the accuracy of the documents. What happens next from then on will prove that intelligence has been changed. Simple "brush contact"s seen before will be seen rarely from then on. Rapid change in the tools of mass media also brings a contradiction with it:
1 - Quicker transfer of information
2 - Lack of security enough while moving faster.

Intelligence organizations or other key institutions of the states need to use instant data transfer methods of communication while obtaining information. They become helpless due to this obligation. Internet and mobile communication make old fashion cryptography techniques inadequate. This also shows itself in the activity of state mechanism. Providing public services in electronic medium is spreading out as the newest benefit of modernism. However, strategic public institutions become vulnerable to the attacks of terrorist groups or hostile countries. The collapse of state mechanism of Latvia after being the victim of cyber attack can be given as an example.
More technical stuff is required while spying activities are done via cyber ways. Nowadays, "hacker"s are substituting "case officer"s. However, none state groups also use the same ways and tools that secret services use. Moreover, some countries use those groups against their hostile countries. Opacity of state mechanism put secret services in difficulty. World is in a transition period and there is a serious struggle between explicit and implicit activities. This struggle leads to spying activities from inside. Sometimes, we may meet with Brutus's that betraying to his own spies or sending them to death. Sometimes, different political interest groups in the same institution can cause leakages in order to strengthen their positions. Today, two main differences are noted while this old method is in use. New tools are used for leakages and the buyer of the leak is not only the newspapers or the hostile countries like before. Activists in the cloak of civilians are the new "customers". The main point that secret services should focus on are not the activists, it is the new market that has created by leaked documents. Thus, before sharing with public, those documents hand in to hostile countries. Today, preventing this seems impossible.
In recent years, there was a tendency of increasing technical stuff that secret services employ. However, a mid-period that "newcomers" focus on opponents secret information more than defending their own is left behind when Wikileaks leakage happened. While the number of spies in land will be decreased, number of hackers focusing on defense will be increased. Moreover, keeping and transferring of information in old fashion became a discussion topic in intelligence world. "Build-up Material" or "spam"; "Case Officer" or "hacker", discussion will continue a little more on this axis.
While 80% of the intelligence is said to be explicit, almost a very little section kept as "top secret". This means most of intermediary information is unprotected. State mechanism display a transparent view. All of the actions are done by code via internet. Momentary passwords sent to cell phones or firewalls are not enough. Even though state institutions use national software as a protection, they look like a house made of glass. Bedrooms are visible with their secret drawers.